1. Introduction
2. Our Main Page
3. Storing and Maintaining DataGrid CheckBox Values
4. Repopulate our DataGrid
5. ASP.NET 2.0 GridView Version
6. Conclusion

Comments

1. Tony Schlein
   10 Apr 2008 at 11:15

   hi all, 

   i faced the same problem, but i have paging in the grid view, so my problem is

   when user checks one record in a page and goes to the next page and selects some records there, when he returns to the previous page we need to keep the checked state of whatever records he had checked earlier. When he is finished checking through the pages, he needs a list of records he has checked to delete them form database

   iam a new in this forum, i need any one help me as i searched alot and i didn't find any solution

   thanks

2. Oleg Delev
   01 Jun 2007 at 21:23

   Hi Dimitrios,

   Thanks for such a great tutorial. It works for me. Keep it up.

   Oleg

3. soorajhere
   13 May 2007 at 14:42
   sir,I am new to this gridview.I want to delete checked rows from my database.In the grid view i have 4 columns,and compan name is the first column.I want to take the value of the company name column and use it in delete query.I am using the following code,but after executing the line string cname=row.cells[0].text,cname is showing the null value.Why?
   
   my code under delete button_click event is this
   
      
           foreach(GridViewRow row in Exp_SummaryGrid.Rows)
              
           {
              string  cname = row.cells[0].text;
               string del = "delete from exp_summary where company=" + cname;
               CheckBox cb = (CheckBox)row.Cells[4].Controls[1];
               if (cb.Checked==true)
               {
                   SqlCommand delsql = new SqlCommand();
                   delsql.Connection = conn;
                   delsql.CommandText = del;
                   delsql.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
                   SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(del, conn);
                   da.DeleteCommand = delsql;
                   DataSet ds2 = new DataSet();
                   da.Update(ds2, "exp_summary");
               }
   
   
           }
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
4. Agrapha
   02 May 2007 at 16:45
   Do you have the C# version of this code somewhere? I just came across this situation with check boxes and paging. I'm using VS2005C# and my code has check boxes on each row and I'm iterating thru them to check if they are checked but if you select a few on the first page and them switch to the second page of the gridview then switch back the gridview loses what items are checked. I could use some help converting your VB into C# 2005. 
5. Dimitrios Markatos
   23 Oct 2006 at 18:25

   Hey Thanks! Good suggestions. Now the question remains in getting to those :-) As for .NET 2.0, this article has it already included.

   Thanks again!

6. Tim Wareing
   19 Jul 2006 at 08:15

   Having tried your solution I was impressed by the ease with which it worked and it started me thinking of extensions to the principle.

   Can I request that you extend the sample code with some additional features?

   Firstly add an option to take all the selected records and then insert them into another file. One possible use of this would be to create a shopping 'wish list'.

   Secondly to add an update feature. One use of this would be to amend prices of a products in price list, and produce a listing/report before committing the amendments.

   Thirdly, add a count of records selected (displayed in the footer?).

   And to be really cheeky, can you do it in ASP.NET 2.0 (in case you finish your version before I finish mine)    ;-)

    

7. John Middleton
   19 May 2006 at 21:30

   Got if figured out. Seems that I inadvertantly had two select_deselectAll routines so it didn't know which to use. Even though in visual studeo it indicates that you cant, via a squiggle under the onclick, have an OnClick event for the asp:Checkbox, you can point it to a javascript routine since that runs only on the client. Also I removed the OnCheckChanged. - john

8. John Middleton
   18 May 2006 at 23:34

   In net 1.1 how do you get the CheckAll to work? First, I cant use the OnClick since it is not available.  Second, if I try to use the OnCheckChanged event I cant point it to the javascript selectdeselectAll routine because it is not a member of 'ASP.mDatagridaspx'.  How do you apply events to a datagrid checkbox?  Other things are working fine but sure frustrating to not figure this out.  - john

9. Dimitrios Markatos
   03 Feb 2006 at 14:35

   Yevgeniy,
   

   
   No, not at all. No big deal really. We all hope to learn, as I from you as well.:D
   

   
   Thanks, and equal respect to you.:)
   

   
   -Jimmy

10. Yevgeniy Mironov
    03 Feb 2006 at 13:46

    Well Dimitrios... must admit when you provided those links on StringBuilder vs static concatenation, I just quickly looked through them and was sure that was just another article advocating for static concatenations when the number of strings is known. Now I read it carefully and was surprised and ashamed... It seems like it's me who would be "seeding bad practices" in such a case... Sorry and my respect to you...

11. Dimitrios Markatos
    03 Feb 2006 at 13:11

    No, I appreciate the point you're trying to get across Yevgeniy. At any rate, as I indicated earlier, I agree with you when the concatenation is for minimal strings, but when you are concatenating numerous strings or functions the overhead in instantiation is overall justified I feel, and better practice.
    

    
    But either way, you're not really going to notice much truly in the way of performance, especially when you apply other performance enhancing techniques, ie, disabling debugging and tracing, closing connections, or even better bind a Datagrid from a Datareader instead of a DataSet for even greater advantages in speed, etc. In .NET, it's the collective means, rather than one tweak, that'll determine a scalable and efficient application.
    

    
    This applies to looping page size, that in my experience simply displaying a few hundred per page is still ill-advised, and with anything one does in greater magnitude, comes with it degrading performance regardless of much code manipulation.

12. Yevgeniy Mironov
    03 Feb 2006 at 07:42

    I meant that instead of
    

    
    stringBuilder.Append(str1);
    stringBuilder.Append(str2);
    stringBuilder.Append(str3);
    

    
    you'd better use
    

    
    str1 + str2 + str3
    

    
    That's definitelly gonna be better.
    

    
    As for looping through form elements, I agree, it raises an issue only on a large amount of form elements. But who knows how large is going to be a particular page in question your readers will be working on.

13. Dimitrios Markatos
    02 Feb 2006 at 16:42

    Yevgeniy,
    

    
    Thanks for your input, but I would have to disagree on looping through all the elements on the given page being a performance issue, when it's looping through 10 checkboxes per page, not a million. Additionally, utilizing state management via session or viewstate further enhances performance and scalability. So there's no such thing as suboptimal when you perform the task at hand in the manner best suited.
    

    
    Now regarding your bias using the Stringbuilder class, again I would disagree. First of all, it's good practice in using Stringbuilder as there is performance advantages over static string concatenation - How StringBuilder string concatenation affects performance , string builder vs string concatenation "+" and Use StringBuilder to Build Strings Efficiently. So in my example it’s fine and justified.
    

    
    I will however give you this though, that I definitely agree with you on not using StringBuilder for 5 lines of code. Incidentally, in Part 1 of my article I did in fact use string concatenation if that makes a difference for you.
    

    
    But all in all Yevgeniy, I wouldn't just go out and post comments on articles unless you truly have facts to support your claims, which is why the statements you’ve made can "seed a bad practice, especially among newbies."

14. Yevgeniy Mironov
    01 Feb 2006 at 15:33
    You see, Dimitros,
    
    while thank you very much for this article and other I was lucky to read before, I must admit there are times when you suggest a way to solve a problem in a quite suboptimal way.
    
    It's rarely good to loop through all form elements to find checkboxes appropriate. Well must admit under normal circumstances it can hardly pose a performance hit, but still when number of records is high or the html file is large (which is not good, I know, but I saw times when there seemed to be no other way), it takes a certain amount of time to iterate through all elements. I think it's better to have a client-side array of ids of all checkboxes in question. And on the server side you just emit client side code for each checkbox to register itself with that array. In this case anytime you need to loop through all checkboxes you simply loop through array elements which is much better from performanse standpoint.
    
    Then, I saw how you suggested to create client-side code via a long series of StringBuilder's Append method while it could have been done through static string concatenation. You can seed a bad practice, especially among newbies
    
    No time to write more, gotta be going Next time I'll write more.
    
    Thank you for your articles. Usually, I like them
    
    Yevgeniy
    
    
15. Dimitrios Markatos
    22 Jan 2006 at 20:52
    Hello all,
    
    Since I have had this article published here, I have now also been able to implement a way to highlight the selected row or entire set of rows and maintain this state across pages just as in my article, with of course the added benefit of showing users which row(s) they've checked, even when they happen to page back.
    
    To get this going, follow these four steps.
    
    First, add the style properties to the DataGrid:
    
    Code:

    
    <SelectedItemStyle BackColor="#F5EDED" ForeColor="Black">
    </SelectedItemStyle>
    
    <ItemStyle BackColor="White" ForeColor="Black">
    </ItemStyle>
    

    
    
    Second, add the highlightChkBxRow(this); JavaScript function call to both checkbox onClick events, so it now becomes:
    
    Code:

    
    OnClick="javascript: highlightChkBxRow(this); return select_deselectAll (this.checked, this.id);"
    

    
    
    Third, in the code behind - add the following JS function within the Registered Script Block section to handle the client side checkboxes:
    
    Code:

    
    .Append ("function highlightChkBxRow(chkbx) {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" if (chkbx.id.indexOf ('DeleteThis') != -1) {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" if (chkbx.checked) {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" chkbx.parentElement.parentElement.style.backgroundColor='#F5EDED';" & nl)
    .Append (" chkbx.parentElement.parentElement.style.color='#000000';" & nl)
    .Append (" } else {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" chkbx.parentElement.parentElement.style.backgroundColor='#FFFFFF';" & nl)
    .Append (" chkbx.parentElement.parentElement.style.color='#000000';" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" }" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" } else {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" var frm = document.forms[0];" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" for (h = 0; h < frm.length; h++) {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" if (frm.elements[h].id.indexOf ('DeleteThis') != -1) {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" if (chkbx.id.indexOf ('CheckAll') != -1 && chkbx.checked) {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" frm.elements[h].parentElement.parentElement.style.backgroundColor='#F5EDED';" & nl)
    .Append (" frm.elements[h].parentElement.parentElement.style.color='#000000';" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" } else {" & nl & nl)
    .Append (" frm.elements[h].parentElement.parentElement.style.backgroundColor='#FFFFFF';" & nl)
    .Append (" frm.elements[h].parentElement.parentElement.style.color='#000000';" & nl & nl)
    
    .Append (" }" & nl)
    .Append (" }" & nl)
    .Append (" } //loop" & nl)
    .Append (" }" & nl)
    .Append ("}" & nl)
    

    
    
    And, finally to maintain our selected rows across pages, replace the RePopulateCheckBoxes () method with the one listed below:
    
    Code:

    
    Sub RePopulateCheckBoxes ()
    
    CheckedItems = New ArrayList
    
    CheckedItems = Session ("CheckedItems")
    
    If Not IsNothing(CheckedItems) Then
    
    'Loop through DataGrid Items
    For Each dgItem in MyDataGrid.Items
    
    ChkBxIndex = MyDataGrid.DataKeys(dgItem.ItemIndex)
    
    'Repopulate DataGrid with items found in Session
    If CheckedItems.Contains(ChkBxIndex) Then
    
    CheckBox = CType(dgItem.FindControl("DeleteThis"), CheckBox)
    CheckBox.Checked = True
    
    dgItem.ForeColor = MyDataGrid.SelectedItemStyle.ForeColor
    dgItem.BackColor = MyDataGrid.SelectedItemStyle.BackColor
    
    Else
    
    dgItem.ForeColor = MyDataGrid.ItemStyle.ForeColor
    dgItem.BackColor = MyDataGrid.ItemStyle.BackColor
    
    End If
    
    Next
    
    End If
    
    'Copy ArrayList to a new array
    Results = CheckedItems.ToArray(GetType(String))
    
    'Concatenate ArrayList with comma to properly send for deletion
    deletedIds = String.Join(",", Results)
    
    End Sub
    

    
    
    And that's it. You're now able to offer the user the added functionality of highlighting the row they've checked or all the rows and persist their selections across pages!
    
    -Jimmy Markatos
16. Developer Fusion Bot
    01 Jan 1999 at 00:00

    This thread is for discussions of Selecting, Confirming & Deleting Multiple Checkbox Items In A DataGrid/GridView - Part 2: Maintaining CheckBox State Acr.