Is there a difference between HTML and HTM

old crappy systems, i think like windows 3.1, cant have file extensions longer than 3 characters so .html confuses them.

but that's so far in the past that you can feel as free as you like to use the full acronym cos it always works and i think htm looks awful

looks better??
what are you on
its an extension!!! who cares what it looks like??

part of the beauty of a web site is its URL in the address bar

if you say so

but alot of people dont even look at the URL

yeah especially if its within frames, the url really wont be seen .............. but hey paul u can love whatever u like, ie the english love beer, scotish love haggis and the welsh love shee.....

oooooooooo
thats not fair
im english (and i love my beer)
but im going to uni in wales
and i cant stand sheep!!!


but there are an aweful lot of them in wales

*gasp*! your profile says you're 17 and you like beer?!?!?! hehehehe

sheep are cool dont be nasty!

baaaahhhh

and colin -> anyone who is still using frames in 2004 should be slapped round the face with a wet kipper

hey dont dis frames
yes i like beer
well lager to be precise

ive been drinking for years
im 6'4" you see and well when you can grow stubble overnight people believe that your 18 ALOT!!!

well frames argument is bit like css-tables argument, use them in the right context and methods and they can be fine, ie my site ??? 2 frames, works on all browsers i know and is simple menu > info layout style... (correct me if im wrong)

ogh for beer goto

http://www.virtualbartender.beer.com/beer_usa.htm

and typing words in and clicking go.

try ass, strip, shower, banana, kiss, fight, bend, topless, pillow fight, head and anymore you can think of

ok i will at home
im at college and the site is blocked by the servers
damm them!!

it rocks

Quote:

[1]Posted by Rollershade on 18 Nov 2004 03:11 AM[/1]
yeah especially if its within frames, the url really wont be seen .............. but hey paul u can love whatever u like, ie the english love beer, scotish love haggis and the welsh love shee.....

i hear that new zealanders love sheep... any feedback about that? (apart from if i've mispelt zealand)

please send me some notess about HTML and HTM and also UML because i am new to this concept

ts. can you tell me one rational reason why frames are told "obsolete"? I don't know non-scripting method to substitute it with full efficiency. The same way we could expell flash or fully-script-dependent pages from "valid web" area, because these things are real threat against "whole web page concept" :). For me is Flash technology greater evil against "document structure" than frame. And beside, frame is ONLY way to make dataflow lower (which not so important today, but it doesn't mean that it is not important at all). Anyway CSS is pretty good, but it isn't all, and sometimes is code much more readable with frame than in CSS and tables/divs. I really can't see much difference between including PHP to scrollable DIV and showing different document in FRAME. - and of course the way document behaves is character of document, not how document works and what code it has. That's my opinion. I like .