One-size-fit-all fits nothing! Just one kind of AOP won't fit all applications, either.
Therefore, there are many choices available when using Spring-AspectJ
combination. First, there is a choice about AOP system: proxy-based AOP or
bytecode-based AOP. Then there is a syntax choice: traditional AspectJ,
@AspectJ, and XML syntax. Within bytecode-based weaving, there are weaving
choices: build time weaver or load-time weaver (LTW). If you choose LTW, you
have further choices of AspectJ agent-driven or Spring-driven LTW. Confused?
Don't be. These choices, while confusing at first, exists for a reason. This session
explores all these choices and provides guideline on choosing the right
combination to make you successful with AOP.
Parleys.com: Making Sense of AOP Choices
Produced by Parleys.com
published 12 years ago
| Filed in
One-size-fit-all fits nothing! Just one kind of AOP won't fit all applications, either.Therefore, there are many choices available when using Spring-AspectJcombination. First, there is a choice about AOP system: proxy-based AOP orbytecode-based AOP. Then there is a syntax choice: traditional Aspe...
- Running time
- 0h19m
- File size
- 13.00MB
Episode synopsis
You might also like...
XML forum discussion
-
los angeles escorts
by worldescortspage (0 replies)
-
Instant Manifestation Secrets Reviews
by Isabellerees78 (0 replies)
-
Translate a Google Form according to the browser language
by omara_sheikh (0 replies)
-
Blog Traffic - Get Easy Blog Traffic With an Email List
by sabinasimu7 (0 replies)
-
C++ Raycast using SFML
by Buttercup314 (0 replies)
Comments